The Politics of Lust: Prostitution Undressed
By KittyStryker
Whore. It's a current hot-button word, bringing to mind high heels, short
skirts and heroin junkies. It brings to mind the kind of girl you see on
the TV show COPS, getting arrested on a street corner, barely aware they're
going to jail. These women are victims of society, probably on one drug
or another, raped and beaten by pimps and johns, likely to live fast and
die young. So then why would radical feminists be calling for prostitution,
the cause of these dire situations, to be legalized?
Because that's a small, inaccurate piece of what prostitution really looks
like.
Prostitutes range wildly from the stereotypical street hookers to classy
San Francisco “geishas”. Some call themselves “sacred intimates”,
going the path of a sensual high priestess. Others are trained massage
therapists. Many prostitutes (who also call themselves “escorts” to
avoid legal problems) are well-educated girls and guys who are just out
of or putting themselves through college, their classes ranging from Business
to Fashion, and have talents ranging from languages to computer repair.
There's thick prostitutes and Glamour magazine models, nymphets and mature
older women. And in case that wasn't enough variety, there's men and transsexuals
to spice the escort world up a bit.
While their stats may vary, almost all of them come with a disclaimer-
“Money exchanged in legal adult personal services for modeling is simply
for time and companionship. Anything else that may or may not happen is
a matter of personal choice and personal preference between two or more
consenting adults of a legal age.” (Eros San Francisco: Nadia Kai)
This disclaimer is necessary for any and all escort advertisements, since
escorting is illegal in most of the United States. By stating that the
money is for time and companionship, a prostitute may get around the actual
exchange of sex for money. Many are careful with their words and actions,
using euphemisms such as “professional companion” for what they do.
Others work under the guise of massage parlors or strip clubs. The Internet
has been a popular place to post advertisements, making street prostitution
an unnecessary and dangerous alternative. Since most of the prostitutes
who are arrested are street prostitutes, this firewall can be an invaluable
protection.
Considering police are always on the alert for prostitutes, and are eager
to arrest them, this precaution can be the difference between jail and
freedom. The police get almost too much freedom on what they can do to
a suspected whore. A St. Paul, Minnesota government website (Prostitution
Arrest Photos.) shows photos of women and men arrested for engaging in
prostitution; one glance shows you that most of the women are black, and
the two johns are older white men. I'm unsure as to the point in displaying
photos of these people, along with their full name and stats. A few towns
insist that their officers engage in sex acts before making an arrest,
such as the publicized Spotsylvania, Virginia case. In some areas, this
tactic works against the officers, causing the cases to be dropped. But
in others, such as Spotsylvania, this abuse of power causes the prostitutes
to be convicted of felonies (Associated Press). The hypocrisy of arresting
women for prostitution and requiring that a police officer use their services
in order to do so is an obvious abuse of power. Many officers who arrest
prostitutes abuse the women, refusing to read them their rights and using
force. One woman, recounting one of her arrests, said she had never even
agreed to any sexual services, but just accepted money from an officer:
“In a few seconds he flashed a brown wallet and tells me I'm under arrest
for prostitution.
'No, I'm not. I didn't do nothing. I did not agree to anything verbally.
'Get up against the wall. You're under arrest.'...
He grabbed me. Since I did not get a clear look at any type of badge,
I got scared and thought I was going to be raped and robbed (note: something
which happens a lot on the street- rapists pose as police)...he grabbed
me by my hair and slammed me against a brick-building wall...He grabbed
me by my hair and forcibly dragged me for about three meters. He then called
for assistance... the other officer kept telling me that he would like
to take me north somewhere and he would beat the shit out of me and leave
me for dead. He then told the other officer that the next person who resists
would be shot, and I told him to shoot me and just get it over with.”
(Leigh, 2004)
Her story is only one of many that express the same sentiment; police officers
more likely to abuse you than clients are, and if you get raped while on
the street, you're helpless to get legal help.
The statistics of the actual arrests are also skewed wildly, and express
incredible accounts of racism. A disproportionate number of prostitutes
arrested and sent to jail are women of color, although a minority of prostitutes
are ethnic minorities. 85-90% of those arrested work on the street, yet
street work accounts for approximately 20% of prostitutes, though the figures
may vary from state to state. (Prostitution in The United States - The
Statistics). While many who oppose prostitution feel that street prostitutes
are a danger to neighborhoods and children, they fail to recognize that
street hooking is only one form of prostitution, and that many other forms
exist under the radar. Claims that drug use is a problem among prostitutes
rarely proves true in statistics; half of the escorts who use substances
did so before they became prostitutes, and most of those who use drugs
are on the street. Prostitutes who are inside, whether it be in massage
parlors or incall/outcalls, are much less likely to engage in substance
abuse. (Prostitution in The United States - The Statistics). Instead of
trying to decriminalize prostitution and allow these women and men a safe
place in which to conduct their business, these opponents of decriminalization
choose to increase police and legal action, which neither solves the underlying
problem of why women become prostitutes or protects them once they become
prostitutes.
It's interesting, too, that the government feels the need to crack down
on what happens between two(or more!) consenting adults, simply because
there's a cash exchange for sexual encounters. Other forms of bodywork
are acceptable in our society, as long as they don't give genital pleasure.
Working as a masseuse is perfectly legal, until they include genitals in
their massage; one woman felt shame about her work at an erotic massage
parlor, simply because she included the male's penis in her touch. While
giving someone's body pleasure is a legal profession, it stops being acceptable
if the pleasure is sexual. Another ridiculous example of this antisexual
stigma is the professional Dominatrix. These women beat clients for money,
a type of sex work that is legal as long as they don't provide sexual satisfaction,
leading one to conclude that paying for pain is acceptable, but not pleasure.
Prostitution's illegality is irrational, and is really an indication of
a greater issue- our deeply rooted problem with sexuality in general (Ince
222-232).
Some people dislike the concept of prostitution, not because it's sexual
in nature, but because it “victimizes women”. While it's foolish to
ignore that some prostitutes are victimized by pimps, clients and domestic
abuse, it's also crazy to ignore that this is in part because we have no
job perimeters for prostitution. In areas like Europe, where prostitution
is decriminalized, there are areas one can go to find that activity. By
shutting down motels, brothels and massage parlors, US police force the
activity into the street, where neighbors are unwillingly exposed to it.
To call these women “victims” because of the sex work they do ignores
the fact that arresting women for sex crimes can render them unemployable,
thereby making them more likely to abuse drugs and begin criminal activity.
These women are made victims more by government practices than by their
clients. The crime rate has lowered in Nevada, where brothels are available
and sex work is legal in certain places. In fact, while many people work
in the sex industry because they cannot make ends meet any other way, other
sex workers simply enjoy the work and receive both income and personal
satisfaction from it. One such sex worker wrote: "All in all prostitution
has been good to me and I have been good to it. . . . I don't really have
to work anymore, but I love the business, so I still see my regular clients"
(Sommer). Contrary to media's portrayal, many prostitutes are independent
contractors, able to decide on the clients they want to see, when they
want to work and how much they want to charge for their services. This
independence allows for a happier work situation that may offer them the
time needed for school, taking care of children, or another job.
Feminists have long split over the issue of prostitution. Traditional
feminists see prostitution as reenacting gender roles, making women into
commodities to be bought and sold. One extreme example is Andrea Dworkin,
who states that prostitution is like gang rape, punctuated by a money exchange
(Ince 229). Sex-positive feminists, in contrast, believe that prostitution
is a job like any other, and that the stigma has to do more with our problems
with women being sexual beings than with the buying and selling of services.
Margot St James is credited as saying “In this prostituting society,
we all have to hustle, and I'd rather suck cock than kiss ass!” I believe
this points to the fact that our society is based on the buying and selling
of goods and services, and that to some extent or another, every member
of our society has to whore themselves out for some reason, whether it
be to go further in the business or get a better offer. Perhaps the type
of prostitution isn't sexual, but even job sites recommend you learn how
to “sell yourself”. They ask, why is it more acceptable for a woman
to be a brownnoser in a business than it is for her to work for herself
as a prostitute? Both sides have excellent points, and I believe the answer
will be found somewhere in the middle of both.
Prostitution is often called the “world's oldest profession”. While
that may or may not be true, we do know that sex work was initially something
that sacred temple priestesses did as a service to bring followers closer
to the goddess. Its criminalization came along with Christianity and its
subsequent criminalization of everything sexual and feminine. I believe
that we need to look back to where the selling of sex moved from sacred
to profane, and pick apart the problem from there. I don't think it's as
simple as whores are victims or whores are empowered... I think society
has woven a web around sexuality that is far more complicated. I believe
only when we can step back, and look at how we criminalize all types of
sexuality and desire, can we truly begin to create a solution to prostitution
that validates sex workers and the clients that visit them.
Associated Press. "Sheriff Defends Detectives Allegedly Having Sex To Bust
Prostitutes." NCB4.com News 13 Feb 2006. 27 Feb 2006
"Eros San Francisco: Nadia Kai." San Francisco Women for Couples, Female
Adult Entertainers for Men and Women in San Francisco, CA. Eros Guide.
27 Feb. 2006 .
Ince, John . The Politics of Lust. Amherst: Prometheus Books, 2004.
Leigh, Carol. Unrepentant Whore: Collected Works of Scarlot Harlot. San
Francisco: Last Gasp, 2004.
"Prostitution in The United States - The Statistics." PENet: Prostitution
Issues: Statistics. PENet. 27 Feb. 2006 .
"Prostitution Arrest Photos.." This Week's Prostitution Photos--Saint Paul
Police. 13 Feb 2006. St. Paul Police Dept.. 27 Feb. 2006 .
Sommer, Joseph C. Legalize Prostitution. 27 Feb. 2006 .
Comments on "The Politics of Lust: Prostitution Undressed"
-
On Tuesday, June 23, 2009, Gaz
(10) wrote:
Really well researched. Speaking as a feminist that generally leans toward the anti-porn side, this article was really well done. You managed to lay out the reality and fantasy and make a point that didn't sound like it was blaming the anti-porn feminists for all the troubles in the world. I think we can both agree that the women involved need to be the focus of the discussion rather than morality.
-
On Wednesday, May 7, 2008, freudian-slip
(236) wrote:
I can't help but think how recently women were given "equal rights" when I read this.
-
A former member wrote:
Try to remember that I love you....
It doesn't matter what I've been through or what I took from my expreiences. Who am I to judge what you took from yours? My opinion is I think you're worth far more than what you could ever sell yourself for.....No one could afford the price I would ever ask for such a strong will, beautiful mind and unabashed sense of self.
-
On Sunday, February 4, 2007, darkdesires
(139) wrote:
I'm gonna have to learn more about SWOP from my aussie friend liz. However this was beyond great.
-
On Sunday, August 6, 2006, Jaded Jezzabelle
(328) wrote:
WOW....As a manager of an "outcall service" here in vegas for the past 17 years...I have to say everything you stated to be true and factual...But I have to say from my observation and from long term friendships I have formed with the girls I book calls f
-
On Sunday, August 6, 2006, Jaded Jezzabelle
(328) wrote:
for...i have to insist that prostitution is far from a victimless crime....as long as remains a crime all who are involved in it fall victim to a hypocritical goverment.
-
On Saturday, July 29, 2006, xserratedsoulx
(212) wrote:
very well researched! ~lauren~
-
A former member wrote:
wonderfull!
-
A former member wrote:
no doubt.. well argued. reminds me of Kristeva and other feminists the abject psyche of women under the diminution of Xstian patriarchy, love the conclusion!
-
A former member wrote:
Oh, and I knew I had a thing for priestesses and altars and something about sacred sharing of ecstacic experiences and.. hey! do you know any practicing "sacred temple priestesses" ? ;)
-
On Sunday, May 28, 2006, KittyStryker
(710) wrote:
yes, i do. :)
-
A former member wrote:
*wewt!!......... the 'plot' thickens* ;)~
-
On Tuesday, May 16, 2006, Dancing_Monkey
(1228) wrote:
Well written..
-
On Tuesday, February 28, 2006, Alanarchy
(1168) wrote:
Quite interesting. You can argue both sides, as you've said, but I agree with you when you say that society has been diluted to the points. Actually, I'm as conflicted as you are on this subject. But not on this piece. Well written. Nice work.
-
A former member wrote:
I dig it, very compelling argument. I especially liked your points about how much safer it is when its legalized, as it is in Europe and here in Australia. I would still say that most people in the prostitution industry would prefer doing something else
-
A former member wrote:
but not by as much of a margin as is generally thought. They do make a killing too. Anywho, thanks for the read, definately some food for thought.
-
On Tuesday, February 28, 2006, KittyStryker
(710) wrote:
yeah, SWOP in Australia is an amazing group, too. I'm jealous. :)